Re: [xslt] Xalan vs libxslt report



On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 12:36:15PM -0000, spinmar@interfree.it wrote:
> 
> Hi,
 Hi to you ....

 [nice tests omitted]
 
> 
> 
> Well these are my opinions:
> 
> - Libxslt is much more robust (break is always 0.00).
> - Libxslt is faster than Xalan: as the queries grow, the responce time difference is relevant.
> I suppose that my choice will be libxslt.
>1 
> 
> Any suggestions?

Well, just to second your experiences: we use a libxml2/libxslt based
Apache module to transform all content in realtime for a major german
newspaper's website (www.zeit.de) and so far had no problems with
stability or performance (and we _do_ have some traffic, if i might
say so ;-) Performance is so good that i never even bothered switching 
of the debugging options.
BIG kuddos to Daniel!

  Ralf Mattes


> Bye
> 
> --Marco 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------
> 
> Salve, il messaggio che hai ricevuto
>  stato inviato per mezzo del sistema
> di web mail interfree. Se anche tu vuoi 
> una casella di posta free visita il
> sito http://club.interfree.it
> Ti aspettiamo!
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/
> xslt@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]