Re: [xslt] Release of libxslt-1.0.24

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 11:24:12AM +0100, Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> Just curious about the following feature:
> 
> On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 17:14, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> 
> >   * document() now support fragment identifiers in URIs
> 
> Fragment identifiers for the XML mime types seems to still be moving
> ground... 
> 
> Can you tell me which XPointer schemes are supported (assuming these
> fragments are based on the XPointer PR) and for the schemes which rely
> on schemas, which schema languages (DTD or W3C XML Schema) are
> supported?

  It reuses libxml2 XPointer implementation which is based on the slightly
older draft:
    http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-xptr-20000607
I will probably update if/when it reaches REC (or if people start to 
pressure me :-)
  So no Schemas support, only DTD for ID identification is present,
I would add xml:id within seconds if I felt any backing up at W3C.

  Note that the XInclude implementation of libxml2 also reuses the same code.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@redhat.com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/