Re: [xslt] C++ bindings for libxslt

[Peter Jones <mlists pmade org>]

Hey, remember back when Daniel Veillard said:
> Murray Cumming realized xmlwrapp existed *after* taking over libxml++
> This doesn't necessarilly mean he doesn't want both to merge. Probably
> not easy from a pure technical point of view though...

In the end, I think that both libraries are good, because they give
developers a choice. When libxml++ completes its transition to "one class
per node type", the xmlwrapp and libxml++ interfaces will be different
enough to cater to different developer styles.

BTW, thanks for updating the web site. I think the link on the FAQ page
is broken, it is doubled. Could you also change my email address on the
bindings page to xmlwrapp@pmade.org. Thanks.

-- 
Peter Jones <unix;c++;crypto;xml;vi;4wd;geek> [ http://pmade.org ]
PGP Fingerprint: 27AD 7922 D3BC 46A3 3627 D7B4 4240 46C3 A41E 844A