Re: [xslt] document('')
- From: Matt Sergeant <matt sergeant org>
- To: "xslt gnome org" <xslt gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [xslt] document('')
- Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 08:17:55 +0100 (BST)
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:22:10AM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > Yes I did, but breaking one of these fundamental features of XSLT just
> > because I'm using strings instead of files seems daft. I guess Daniel's
> > mileage varies there ;-)
> >
> > Michael Kay's book specifies that document('') refers to "the stylesheet
> > itself". It says nothing about relative/absolute URIs, which is only
> > relevant when the string has length > 0, as far as I can make out.
>
> The document() functions is being passed a string which is an
> URI-Reference.
> Using '' as an URI reference when the pointed document has no
> base (like when aquired from a pipe) is simply meaningless.
> The reference ain't Michael Kay's wording but RFC 2396 and Co.
> In general passing document as in-memory strings do have a LOT
> of impact on a lot of XML or more generally Web related standards
> because they tend to rely heavilly on URI-References and those
> quite often rely on the Base URI which is no more available in this
> case.
>
> The behaviour changed from reusing the stylesheet document to
> reparsing it from scratch for compliance to the XSLT specification,
> see the bug reported by Eric van der Vlist last month:
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/xslt/2002-June/msg00055.html
>
> I could try to reimplement the same old behaviour, but faking
> a semantic to '' URI-References when there is no base doesn't sound
> a good idea
You could default the base URI to something like string:/, then things
should just work. Alternatively I'll do that in XML::LibXSLT.
--
<!-- Matt -->
<:->Get a smart net</:->
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]