Re: [xslt] [PATCH] Cygwin corrections for 1.0.10

["Robert Collins" <robert collins itdomain com au>]

===
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Veillard" <veillard@redhat.com>
To: <xslt@gnome.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: [xslt] [PATCH] Cygwin corrections for 1.0.10


> On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 09:14:03PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 08:59:59PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > > > Oh, and other than the breakpoint / libxslt directory order
change,
> > the
> > > > Makefile.am changes require 1.5, and as for xml can be skipped
(I'll
> > > > maintain them in my cygwin-only patch kit).
> > >
> > >   Do you mean that you patch adds a requirement on automake-1.5 ?
> > > If yes, that's not acceptable, and I would prefer a workaround.
> >
> > Is adding IN_LIBfoo to certain headers ok - as you did for libxml?
>
>   I assume so, yes.
>
> > That will also work - but which headers are relevant for libexslt
and
> > libxslt?
>
>   libxslt/libxslt.h

Can we create libexslt/libexslt.h for libexslt then ?

Rob