Re: [xslt] [PATCH] Cygwin corrections for 1.0.10

["Robert Collins" <robert collins itdomain com au>]

===
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Veillard" <veillard@redhat.com>
To: <xslt@gnome.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: [xslt] [PATCH] Cygwin corrections for 1.0.10


> On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 08:59:59PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > Oh, and other than the breakpoint / libxslt directory order change,
the
> > Makefile.am changes require 1.5, and as for xml can be skipped (I'll
> > maintain them in my cygwin-only patch kit).
>
>   Do you mean that you patch adds a requirement on automake-1.5 ?
> If yes, that's not acceptable, and I would prefer a workaround.

Is adding IN_LIBfoo to certain headers ok - as you did for libxml?

That will also work - but which headers are relevant for libexslt and
libxslt?

Rob