Re: [xslt] Re: Request for comments on :Request for break point API suggestions

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:23:48AM +0000, k_isdale@tpg.com.au wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm at University an I've seen that the diff's 
> didn't appear in my last post the "proper" way :-
> ( . 
> When I can I'll put the files my web site. 
> 
> If Daniel has no objections I'll look at making 
> these files visible as links on my web page. Is 
> this Ok Daniel?

 sure ! I never objected :-)

> I'm starting to think that I shouldn't have be 
> supplying the "patched libraries" so they will be 
> need to be deleted. This is to remove any doubts 
> the "patched libraries" caused.
> 
> These are irrelivant in breakpoint.h
>     struct _xslBreakPoint
>     typedef xslBreakPointPtr 
>     typedef xslBreakPoint
> 
> There are some errors in breakpoint.c/breakpoint.h
>      struct _xslCallPoint{
>        xmlDocPtr source;
>       xmlChar *name;
>      };
> 
>  should be 
>     struct _xslCallPoint{
>       xmlNodePtr source;
>       xmlChar *name;
>     };
> 
>  this effects 
>    void xslAddCall( xmlDocPtr source, xmlChar 
> *name)
>    int xslGetCall(int depth,  xmlDocPtr *source, 
> 	xmlChar **name);
> 
>  which should have been 
>    void xslAddCall( xmlNodePtr source, xmlChar 
> *name)
>    int xslGetCall(int depth,  xmlNodePtr *source, 
> 	xmlChar **name);
> 
>  This should allow access to the "line number" 
> for the template call. 
> 
>  xsldbg is also affected by these changes :-( 

   Focusing on the APIs is my primary concern, once that is agreed upon,
associated code will be extremely fast.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard@redhat.com  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/