[xslt] Re: Request for comments on :Request for break point API suggestions
- From: k_isdale tpg com au
- To: xslt gnome org
- Subject: [xslt] Re: Request for comments on :Request for break point API suggestions
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 01:23:48 GMT
Hi all,
I'm at University an I've seen that the diff's
didn't appear in my last post the "proper" way :-
( .
When I can I'll put the files my web site.
If Daniel has no objections I'll look at making
these files visible as links on my web page. Is
this Ok Daniel?
I'm starting to think that I shouldn't have be
supplying the "patched libraries" so they will be
need to be deleted. This is to remove any doubts
the "patched libraries" caused.
These are irrelivant in breakpoint.h
struct _xslBreakPoint
typedef xslBreakPointPtr
typedef xslBreakPoint
There are some errors in breakpoint.c/breakpoint.h
struct _xslCallPoint{
xmlDocPtr source;
xmlChar *name;
};
should be
struct _xslCallPoint{
xmlNodePtr source;
xmlChar *name;
};
this effects
void xslAddCall( xmlDocPtr source, xmlChar
*name)
int xslGetCall(int depth, xmlDocPtr *source,
xmlChar **name);
which should have been
void xslAddCall( xmlNodePtr source, xmlChar
*name)
int xslGetCall(int depth, xmlNodePtr *source,
xmlChar **name);
This should allow access to the "line number"
for the template call.
xsldbg is also affected by these changes :-(
bye,
Keith
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]