Re: [xslt] Benchmarking
- From: "roger day" <roger nenuphar freeserve co uk>
- To: <xslt gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [xslt] Benchmarking
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 20:42:07 +0100
The are no assignments in XSLT. Period. Kay has a section "programming without assignment statements" in hsi Wrox book. To paraphrase him, assignment statements impose an order of execution - whereas, when downloading an HTML documents, a browser can begin to process any particular part as soon as it becomes available.
Which was why I was surprised to read that recursion testing had quite a low priority. But I can see that trade-offs have to be made, and compliancy has to be a priority. Speed can always be worked on.
Even Lisp has progn!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Heiko Rupp" <hwr@pilhuhn.de>
To: <xslt@gnome.org>
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 16:18
Subject: Re: [xslt] Benchmarking
> Robert Koberg wrote:
>
> > Recursion is VERY important in XSLT. Most experienced XSLT developers would
> > recurse rather than iterate. That being said, it is still pretty fast.
>
>
> As there is no "for i=1 to 10" loop, there often is a need to rebuild
> this by recursion, so recursion is not only a "wish", but a "need".
>
> --
> Heiko W. Rupp http://mcntp.sf.net/
> http://www.pilhuhn.de/hwr/ http://www.netbsd.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> xslt mailing list
> xslt@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt
>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]