Re: [xslt] introduction, xvl.
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: xslt gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xslt] introduction, xvl.
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 07:57:48 -0400
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 12:21:21PM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > i compared xvl to xslt, and found the principles of xslt
> > to be... more programming-based, less xml-based, also
> > that it requires two input files not one,
> If you want something programming based, "standardised", and using only
> one input file, you might want to look into XSP (eXtensible Server Pages)
> from the Apache Cocoon project, also implemented in AxKit (now on CVS
> using a LibXML based parser).
This 'prospective' thread is interesting. I will throw 2 more ideas
in the bag:
- how useful/hard would it be to implement an Apache transformation
module based directly on libxslt, I think I got this question a couple
of time during the last week
- would an extra function
xmlNodePtr xsltGetNodeResult(xmlStylesheetPtr style, xmlDocPtr doc,
be useful, basically it would not run a full XSLT transformation but
compute how the given node would be transformed (assuming it get
processed directly by an xsl:apply-template rule).
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
email@example.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
] [Thread Prev