Re: [xslt] When will XSTL 1.0 fully implemented?
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: "Sze, Tak F" <tak f sze intel com>
- Cc: "'xslt gnome org'" <xslt gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [xslt] When will XSTL 1.0 fully implemented?
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:40:48 -0400
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 09:44:24AM -0700, Sze, Tak F wrote:
> I was looking at the following URL
> http://cvs.gnome.org/lxr/source/libxslt/FEATURES
> which lists the current features as of Feb 17, 2001.
> It said that there are still a number of features
> not implemented. Maybe the list is not updated.
> If so, can someone clarify this?
exclude-result-prefixes support is still missing
I still didn't looked at the work needed to support
Embedding Stylesheets, finding the stylesheet PI is simple,
but if it is a fragment identifier to a loac part of the document
this can get a bit annoying (though libxml has XPointer support
xsl:output cdata-section-elements is not hard, just boring
I should add it
xsl:number
lang = { nmtoken }
letter-value = { "alphabetic" | "traditional" }
and
xsl:sort
lang = { nmtoken }
case-order = { "upper-first" | "lower-first" }
in both cases this is related to specific language support and
a serious pain to implement correctly. I'm not too fond of
adding large languages specific static values, patches welcome
though
extension-element-prefixes is implemented,
Extension Elements and Extension Functions, basically they are there
but I'm unsure element-available() and function-available() work
properly. I didn't tried to implement xsl:fallback either.
So what do you need precisely in this list ? And how urgently
do you need them ? Of course sending decent patches helps getting
features faster.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard redhat com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]