Re: [xml] Additional regexp test files

[Pete Cordell <petexmldev codalogic com>]

I've tried to reduce the patterns that I reported earlier to a minimal 
form.  For the timestamp pattern I've ended up with:

=>ab?c{0,1}
#fails
a
#ok
ab
abc
ac

Interesting the following patterns all pass, even though conceptually 
they are the same pattern.  So I guess there is a difference between 
handling c? and c{0,1}.  That might give a clue as to how to fix the 
problem.

=>ab?c?
a
ab
abc
ac
=>ab{0,1}c{0,1}
a
ab
abc
ac
=>ab{0,1}c?
a
ab
abc
ac
=>ab?c{1,2}
ac
abc
abcc
acc

For the IP address pattern, the simplest I could get it is to:

=>((2{1,2}|24)\.){2}2
#fails
24.24.2

If it would help to have these in the form of a Git patch or some other 
format let me know.

Thanks,

Pete.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Read & write XML in C++: http://www.xml2cpp.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------

On 15/04/2016 17:48, Pete Cordell wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Please can I submit the following regexp test files that should pass,
> but when I test them they fail.  (I'm afraid I'm not smart enough to
> suggest how to fix the code!)
>
> I've attached them and included a git patch so hopefully one of the
> formats is convenient for you.  If not, let me know what would work
> better.  I've included them inline below so you can do a quick scan.
>
> test/regexp/fussyipaddress
> --------------------------
> =>((1?[0-9]{1,2}|2[0-4][0-9]|25[0-5])\.){3}(1?[0-9]{1,2}|2[0-4][0-9]|25[0-5])
>
> 192.168.254.0
>
> test/regexp/timestamp
> ---------------------
> =>\d{8}T\d{6}\.?\d{0,6}
> # This gives incorrect result
> 20160412T112319
> # These give correct result
> 20160412T112319.
> 20160412T112319.43
> 20160412T112319.432312
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pete.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
> xml gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml