Re: [xml] [libxslt] GPL-licensed file being distributed with MIT-licensed libxslt

On 16/09/2015 22:51, Mike Dalessio wrote:
It appears as though the file


is GPL licensed.

This file is being distributed in the libxslt source tarball, which is at odds
with libxslt's MIT license.

The same goes for doc/tutorial/libxslt_tutorial.c which libxslt_pipes.c claims to be based on. Both files are based on the MIT-licensed xsltproc.c but there's nothing wrong with that.

Any thoughts on what, if anything, should be done about it?

It's only part of the documentation, so I don't see a problem.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]