Re: [xml] [libxslt] GPL-licensed file being distributed with MIT-licensed libxslt

[Nick Wellnhofer <wellnhofer aevum de>]

On 16/09/2015 22:51, Mike Dalessio wrote:
> It appears as though the file
>
>      libxslt-1.1.28/doc/tutorial2/libxslt_pipes.c
>
> is GPL licensed.
>
> This file is being distributed in the libxslt source tarball, which is at odds
> with libxslt's MIT license.

The same goes for doc/tutorial/libxslt_tutorial.c which libxslt_pipes.c claims 
to be based on. Both files are based on the MIT-licensed xsltproc.c but 
there's nothing wrong with that.

> Any thoughts on what, if anything, should be done about it?

It's only part of the documentation, so I don't see a problem.

Nick