Re: [xml] xml:base missing on result from XInclude?

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:30:17AM +0200, Susanne Oberhauser-Hirschoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Susanne Oberhauser-Hirschoff <froh suse com> writes:

  Hi Susanne,

> > Daniel, in 2003 you wrote this:
> > https://www.sourceware.org/ml/docbook/2003-03/msg00101.html
> >
> > > I tried to minimize the addition of xml:base when it could be avoided
> > > in practice (i.e. if the absence of the xml:base would not generate
> > > erroneous URI-References to URI computations). This was a deployment
> > > trade-off that I will fix when XInclude and xml:base will get better
> > > acceptance.
> > >
> > > Daniel
>
> I've provided a patch that makes it an option, and a patch that just
> does it as per the test suite.
>
> Either option is ok for me.
>
> I'd appreciate one of them to be considered upstream, so I don't have to
> maintain an extra patchset.
>
> The use case is valid debugging information 'which file does this
> fragment originate from' using lxml or any other tool based on libxml2.

  I completely missed your reply then and the patch, I will look at it
before pushing 2.9.2,

  thanks !

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat
veillard redhat com  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/