Re: [xml] question on versions
- From: Mark Rowe <mrowe apple com>
- To: Joshua Alexander <egomagickian gmail com>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] question on versions
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:15:40 -0700
On 2012-03-15, at 17:48, Joshua Alexander <egomagickian gmail com> wrote:
Hi folks,
I recently built libxml2 2.7.8 on OS X and now apache won't start saying "libphp5.so requires version
10.0.0 or later, but libxml2.2.dylib provides version 9.0.0"
That doesn't make sense to me, so I'm curious, is what apache's saying accurate... or what "version" is
libxml2 2.7.8 supposed to provide?
I would expect libxml2 v2.7.8 to result in libxml2.2.dylib having a "compatibility version" of 10.0.0 and a
"current version" of 10.8.0. A version in the 9.x.y range is indicative of libxml2 v2.6.x. What the error is
saying is that the version of libphp5.so that is being loaded was compiled against libxml2 v2.7.x but the
version of libxml2.2.dylib that is being found at runtime is from libxml2 v2.6.x. If you are on an older
version of OS X (e.g., pre-10.6) then the error suggests that the system version of libxml2.2.dylib is being
loaded rather than your locally built copy. If you're on OS X 10.6 or newer then it's hard to guess where
the old copy of libxml2.2.dylib is coming from.
Hope this helps,
- Mark
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]