Re: [xml] Using psvi field as a second pointer in addition to _private
- From: Brian Smith <brian dbsoft org>
- To: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] Using psvi field as a second pointer in addition to _private
- Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 05:22:12 -0600
On 3/8/12 10:09 PM, Noam Postavsky wrote:
It seems cleaner to put the pointers into a struct, and point _private
to that struct.
Yes that would be cleaner, but it also adds considerable complexity
since I would need to allocate and free all those structs... that is the
fallback plan if there isn't another usable pointer field in the node
struct.
Brian
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]