Re: [xml] Using psvi field as a second pointer in addition to _private

On 3/8/12 10:09 PM, Noam Postavsky wrote:
It seems cleaner to put the pointers into a struct, and point _private to that struct.
Yes that would be cleaner, but it also adds considerable complexity since I would need to allocate and free all those structs... that is the fallback plan if there isn't another usable pointer field in the node struct.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]