Re: [xml] The issue around LoadLibrary on Windows

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
On 7/23/2012 17:23, Earnie Boyd wrote:

How would that "ignore the UNICODE" work?  Defining UNICODE will cause
the API to do different things.

This define only controls macros so if you want LoadLibraryW nothing stops
you to use it directly,
that's how ignoring works - you use -A, or -W versions directly.

You're asking for more trouble.  There are more definitions based on
UNICODE than you can possibly control.  A better option would be to
just add #undef UNICODE in the config.h file if it is defined.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]