Re: [xml] The order of arguments when compiling
- From: Csaba Raduly <rcsaba gmail com>
- To: spam spam spam spam free fr
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] The order of arguments when compiling
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:05:45 +0100
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:06 AM, <spam spam spam spam free fr> wrote:
Hum... I prefer a solution which works if we type :
$ ./configure
$ make
$ make install
If I request my users to do :
$ ./configure
$ make LIBS=`xml2-config --libs`
$ make install
I think they will not be happy.
The best thing is to edit my Makefile.am correctly.
Do you know what is incorrect in my Makefile.am?
I think that `xml2-config --libs` , which outputs -L options (that go
into LDFLAGS) and -l options (that go into LDADD) together, does not
play well with automake that expects them separately.
If xml2-config had separate --ldflags and --libs options, it would
have been easier for you. Unfortunately, it doesn't.
Csaba
--
GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts.
"Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds
"People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]