[xml] parent pointer
- From: Zhigang Chen <zhigangc gmail com>
- To: xml gnome org
- Subject: [xml] parent pointer
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:53:31 -0700
Hi all
Occasionally, I have seen some nodes have its parent pointer set to -1. Also they seem to have been freed
implicitly, because (1) freeing them explicitly would throw error, (2) not freeing them does not incur memory
leaks as reported by xmlMemBlocks.
I am wondering where in the source code the parent pointer is set to -1, and why it's not set to 0.
Thanks
-
Z
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]