Re: [xml] Ambiguity regarding schema content and schema validation

["Pete Cordell" <petexmldev tech-know-ware com>]

According to VS2005 (and I agree with it) 1.xsd is not a valid schema.  You 
can have multiple elements with the same name in the same complex type, but 
those elements have to have the same type.

Also, I think you need to make the URIs contained in the values of your 
xmlns:tns and targetNamespace attributes the same (probably 
xmlns:tns="http://abc.com";).

Even if 1.xsd were valid, I'm not sure why either 2.xml or 3.xml might pass 
validation as there should be a minimum requirement for two b elements.

HTH,

Pete Cordell
Codalogic
Visit http://www.codalogic.com/lmx/ for XML C++ data binding
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nagesh" <nageshs huawei com>
To: <xml gnome org>
Cc: <ashutosh_p huawei com>; <ranjit huawei com>
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 4:19 PM
Subject: [xml] Ambiguity regarding schema content and schema validation


> Hello,
> I am using libxml version 28. I have a query regarding parsing of
> the schema file and as well as schema validation.
> Is the attached schema (1.xsd) syntactically correct, (It is having
> more than 1 element with the same name, in the complex definition). If it 
> is
> correct; instance document (2.xml) is success but whereas the instance
> document (3.xml) is returning failure for schema validation using
> xmlSchemaValidateDoc( ).
> But for schema file, 4.xsd; in which I have interchanged the
> datatype definitions, (xs:int with xs:string and vice-versa), it returns
> success for both instance document 2.xml and 3.xml.
> Any leads will be appreciated. Thanks in advance for the reply.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Nagesh.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> _______________________________________________
> xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
> xml gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml