Re: [xml] TextReader vis-a-vis SAX
- From: "Andrew W. Nosenko" <andrew w nosenko gmail com>
- To: veillard redhat com
- Cc: xml gnome org, ranjit huawei com
- Subject: Re: [xml] TextReader vis-a-vis SAX
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:16:49 +0200
On Aug 29, 2007 3:32 PM, Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 06:50:53PM +0530, harbhanu wrote:
What libxml2 creates is a sliding window over the full document. It
contains the current node and its ancestors. That's the only guarantee
Therefore, if I understand correctly the phrase "It contains the
current node and its ancestors", the input document should be fully
loaded into memory and parsed at first time because of root node (in
any use-case, not only "<a><ab><abc><abcd> ... </abcd></abc></ab></a>"
So, by this does it means that a document with only one nesting will have
the complete document in memory...
<a><ab><abc><abcd>. ..... </abc></abcd></ab></a>
In this case its memory requirement will be almost equivalent to DOM.
yes, stupid design leads to stupid problems, I don't care too much
Andrew W. Nosenko <andrew w nosenko gmail com>
] [Thread Prev