Re: [xml] Better hash function for dict.c

On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 06:59:33PM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote:

Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:05:03AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
  Since you seems to be interested in the performances of the hash 
algorithm, I tried to drop the string comparisons on lookup when possible
I have an old patch for this which I'm enclosing, but I never applied it
since I had problems at the time (can't remember why/where, it's just 
a FYI patch ;-)

  Of course I forgot the patch in the first mail ...

Hmm, wait, this patch is against hash.c, which already contains it (more or
less). I was talking about the hash function in dict.c (see subject line).

  humpf, I got confused, sorry :-)


Red Hat Virtualization group
Daniel Veillard      | virtualization library
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit | Rpmfind RPM search engine

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]