Re: [xml] Correct behaviour of RelaxNG interleave

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 02:57:50PM +0100, Pavol Rusnak wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi!
> I would like to ask, what is the correct behaviour of RelaxNG
> interleave? Suppose we have the following example:
>
> blueA = element blueA { empty }
> blueB = element blueB { empty }
> redA  = element redA { empty }
> redB  = element redB { empty }
>
> blue = blueA? & blueB?
> red  = redA? & redB?
>
> profile_current = blue & red
> start = element profile {
>    profile_current
> }
...
> Simply put: am I able to interlave both red and blue tags mutually or I
> can only interleave blue tags followed with interleaved red ones and
> vice-versa?

  I don't know the compact syntax, I suggest you provide the XML one,
then the diagnostic should be fairly trivial.

Daniel

-- 
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard      | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine  http://rpmfind.net/