Re: [xml] xmllint schema validation

["Buchcik, Kasimier" <k buchcik 4commerce de>]

Hi, 

I also think that Xerces-J is a very good open-source processor;
some people say it's over-engineered; but I liked it this
way, and used it as a reference for many scenarios.
MS .NET should also be good nowadays - and fast; if you are
on Linux, then try Mono's implementation (although I don't know
what is the state here). Another one would be Saxon; also very fine,
and getting better, since one can assume that Mr. Kay wants his
XSLT 2.0 processor work nicely (but the XML Schema part is commercial).

If you need to aggregate schemata with Libxml2, then
use the xsd:include and/or xsd:import mechanism.
Aggregation via the API is not supported in Libxml2.

Regards,

Kasimier

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xml-bounces gnome org [mailto:xml-bounces gnome org] On 
> Behalf Of John Hockaday ga gov au
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 2:01 AM
> To: a w p vaassen xs4all nl; xml gnome org
> Subject: Re: [xml] xmllint schema validation
>
> Hi Ad,
>
> The Xerces-J tool by Apache is very, very good.  It is 
> considered one of the
> best implementations of the W3C XML Schema specification.
>
> I use Oxygen as a GUI that uses Xerces-J.
>
> I hope that this helps.
>
>
> John
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xml-bounces gnome org [mailto:xml-bounces gnome org] On 
> Behalf Of
> a.w.p.vaassen
> Sent: Friday, 25 August 2006 5:55 AM
> To: xml gnome org
> Subject: [xml] xmllint schema validation
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to verify a XML file versus multiple schemas ?
>
> What would be the prefered tool ?
>
> At this moment I am using xmllint but I believe this can only 
> check against
> one schema, please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Kind regards, Ad
> _______________________________________________
> xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
> xml gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml