Re: [xml] speed between XPath & SAX & xmlReader

[nico <sl1200mk2 free fr>]

hi,
i didn't know that 100 nodes are peanuts.
thanks for that point.

best regards
nicolas

> Nico, IMHO I wouldn't bother using SAX2, first it might
> get oversized (in terms of your code) for what you want
> and second: 100 nodes of the kind in your example are
> peanuts for Libxml2. So maybe you want just to consider the
> xmlReader if you want less memory impact, and if memory is
> not so important (and 100 nodes shouldn't, except if you run
> this many times asynchronously) then just parse it into a
> tree and navigate through it; I wouldn't use XPath in the
> latter case, since the structure seems easy to navigate.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kasimier