Re: [xml] libxml-2.0.pc
- From: "lode leroy" <lode_leroy hotmail com>
- To: danilo gnome org, xml gnome org
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [xml] libxml-2.0.pc
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:38:07 +0200
Euh, I meant
Cflags: -I${includedir}/libxml
since it looks from the include dir that the directory is now called
"libxml"
-- lode
From: danilo gnome org (Danilo Å egan)
To: xml gnome org
CC: lode leroy <lode_leroy hotmail com>
Subject: Re: [xml] libxml-2.0.pc
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:16:11 +0200
Today at 11:18, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:07:17AM +0200, lode leroy wrote:
>> I think that in libxml-2.0.pc the line Cflags should read
>> Cflags: -I${includedir} -I${includedir}/libxml2
>> instead of
>> Cflags: -I${includedir}/libxml2 -I${includedir}/libxml2
>
> Hum, I dislike that. You should never write code doing
> #include <libxml2/libxml/....h>
> Can you justify your suggestion ?
The problem is with the same path being repeated (though, it's not a
problem per se, because compiler wouldn't mind that at all).
Cheers,
Danilo
_________________________________________________________________
Free blogging with MSN Spaces http://spaces.msn.com/?mkt=nl-be
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]