Re: [xml] are "nameless" nodes allowed?

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 01:46:01PM +0200, oliverst online de wrote:
> if I call
>
> xmlNewNode(NULL, BAD_CAST "");
>
> and put it into my tree, I get this node in my document:
>
>   <></>
>
> Is this actually allowed? I am not familiar with the standard, but it
> seems wrong to me.

  Yes, don't do that !
Now I'm not sure we should change the API behaviour since people may want 
to make nodes using their own string (though they could still do this
with xmlNewNodeEatName).

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/