Re: [xml] What is the best way to implement semantics?
- From: "John J. Boyer" <director chpi org>
- To: Bruce Miller <bruce miller nist gov>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] What is the best way to implement semantics?
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 12:34:11 -0500 (CDT)
Bruce,
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Bruce Miller wrote:
...
Anyway, a quick google suggests that Daisy is designed exactly for this,
but I'm not sure what implementing Docbook directly buys you.
Docbook is a good model for some kinds of documents but a bad match to others,
so you'd end up with a questionable translation to Docbook.
Why not transform all document types, including Docbook, to Daisy and working
with that?
I understand that Daisy does not yet support math. Are there other xml
formats than docbook that are widely used for technical material?
ïThanks,
John
--
John J. Boyer; Executive Director, Chief Software Developer
Computers to Help People, Inc.
http://www.chpi.org
825 East Johnson; Madison, WI 53703
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]