Re: [libxml++] Re: [xml] libxml version numbers

[Mike Hommey <mh glandium org>]

Jesse Pelton wrote:
> Daniel was giving an example of something he would not guarantee.  With
> that context, what he said was equivalent to, "I would not guarantee
> that an application build [sic] and running with libxml2-2.6.9 will also
> compile with 2.6.8 or will run correctly with 2.6.8 shared libs."  This
> seems reasonable to me.  I think he'd argue that an app built with 2.6.8
> would also work with 2.6.9, barring reliance on bugs in the earlier
> version or the introduction of bugs in the later.

Ah yes, sorry, for an unknown reason, my brain dropped the "not" part of 
the previous mail.

Mike