GNOME.org
 

Re: [xml] Possible malformation "bug" in libxml2

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 11:44:48AM -0800, Regis Wilson wrote:

Solution offered!  See the original thread here:

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/xml/2004-January/msg00098.html

A simple copy-paste of the "Drop tag like browsers do" worked great.  Here's
the diff against 2.6.4 12/24/2003 code:

3240,3242d3239
<         /* Dump the bogus tag like browsers do */
<         while ((IS_CHAR_CH(CUR)) && (CUR != '>'))
<             NEXT;
3250,3252d3246
<         /* Dump the bogus tag like browsers do */
<         while ((IS_CHAR_CH(CUR)) && (CUR != '>'))
<             NEXT;
3262,3264c3256,3257
<                 /* Dump the bogus tag like browsers do */
<                 while ((IS_CHAR_CH(CUR)) && (CUR != '>'))
<                     NEXT;

This covers both cases of <html> and <body> (I hope?).  Comments, criticism,
testing, appreciated!


  Well, try sending a contextual diff, I can guess it may apply to HTMLparser.c
but I would not try betting on pure line numbers as the context...

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]