Re: [xml] question regarding error reporting

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 05:40:25PM -0700, Mark Vakoc wrote:
> Hmmm... fprintf isn't a stuctured error handler, but neither is channel.  I
> believe by the time this segment is reached the search for a structured error
> handler to report the message has been exhausted and there doesn't seem to be a
> means to use custom structured error handlers within relaxng validation.  As
> such there seems to be a "information penalty" when when using custom error
> handlers and the error domain isn't parsing or validating (those seem to be
> handled specially).
>
> So if I understand your explanation correctly the goal is to only call channel
> once per xmlRaiseError call unless the handler happens to be fprintf (as such
> libxml2 knows that it is not a problem call it repeatedly per call to
> __xmlRaiseError)?  If so perhaps __xmlRaiseError can instead call
> xmlReportError2 that would emulate xmlReportError only building the output to a
> string then calling channel just once?

  Okay, that part didn't got that much scrutiny, you seem to have a good
view of that code, I take patches :-)

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/