Re: [xml] Bugzilla product version

From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
To: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm commsecure com au>
Cc: xml gnome org
Subject: Re: [xml] Bugzilla product version
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:48:30 -0500

On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 09:46:09AM +1100, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:

Daniel,

Is it worth making a 'CVS' version for libxml2 in bugzilla, as well as
having all the released versions there?

It always feels a little strange filing reports against problems in CVS
using the "wrong" version number. Of course, if you're happy with it,
then what do I care about it -- but I was just wondering.


  If you know how to do this, why not !

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml] Bugzilla product version
  - From: John Fleck

References:
- [xml] Bugzilla product version
  - From: Malcolm Tredinnick

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]