AW: [xml] Catalogs and relative paths
- From: "Zlatkovic, Igor" <Igor Zlatkovic Dresdner-Bank com>
- To: 'Simon McVittie' <hacks pseudorandom co uk>, xml gnome org
- Subject: AW: [xml] Catalogs and relative paths
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 09:53:34 +0200
I'm currently trying to write a Python/XML-based website
generation program
using the libxml2/libxslt Python bindings; as part of this I
need to do some
sort of URL mapping for source documents, for instance converting
http://wwwsource/foo to file:///home/smcv/websource/foo.xml.
(This lets me
use relative paths starting with / in a convenient way,
without hard-coding
my working directory into the site's source.)
A parh starting with '/' is not relative per definition. If you are using
relative paths across your whole application, then it does not depend on
your working directory in any way.
The catalog mechanism seems like the mechanism I'm after, but
relative paths
don't seem to be treated in the way I'd expect; I'd like to
check whether
this is a bug or a feature before I start trying to fix it :-)
As a test case, I have the following document:
<doc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude">
<txt>This is the correct test.xml.</txt>
<xi:include href="include.xml"/>
</doc>
I place this in rewrite/really-test.xml under my web server
root, set up an
XML catalog mapping from http://localhost/virtual/test.xml to
http://localhost/rewrite/really-test.xml, and do
xsltproc null.xslt http://localhost/virtual/test.xml
where null.xslt is a stylesheet that just prints out text
nodes. As expected,
this outputs "This is the correct test.xml". So far so good.
I then add --xinclude to the command line, hoping to get the text of
http://localhost/virtual/include.xml. Instead, I get the text of
http://localhost/rewrite/include.xml, i.e. the relative URI
is looked up
relative to the final location of the document, rather than
relative to the
location I first asked for.
Is this the intended behaviour of the base path when used
with catalogs, or is
this a bug?
What does the catalog you are using look like?
Ciao,
Igor
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]