Re: [xml] xml bug?
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: "Grosmann, Ruud" <R Grosmann sdu nl>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] xml bug?
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 05:10:56 -0500
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:38:58AM +0100, Grosmann, Ruud wrote:
Can anybody tell me what is happening here?
the new engine does more checking than the old one, especially for
deterministic content model of elements:
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#determinism
uit.tmp2:14: validity error: Content model of body is not determinist:
(besluit | (inhopg? , (boek+ | hfdst+ | titeldl+ | afd+ | par+ | subpar+
| (art , (wart | art)*) | (al? , ((wart+ , art*) | wlid | wond+ | wpar+
| wlichaam))+)))
But double checking manually (building the automata on paper) this looks
determinist, so you may have hit a bug in the new engine. I will look at
the issue and report about it when fully analyzed.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]