[xml] Re: Inclusive and exclusive XML Canonicalization in libxml2

Ok, I've added libxml to [1] and added a column for it in the interop [2].

I'm not yet satisfied with the interop tests for lack of a good framework. 
Some folks use dsig which is very appropriate but others aren't using that, 
and folks have written it in different languages with different APIs so a 
language specific testing framework doesn't seem to work well. (Plus, I'm 
not that experienced with serious interop yet.)

Hopefully someone will send a nice big interop set with different XML 
instances, XPath expressions, and parameters that tests screw cases. Worse 
case, I'll send a manual set when I get the time.

[1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/Overview.html#Code
[2] http://www.w3.org/Signature/2002/02/01-exc-c14n-interop.html

On Monday 04 March 2002 17:44, Aleksey Sanin wrote:

Thanks a lot for your reply! Your answers make the picture clear.
The C14N and Exc-C14N implementations are included in the
gnome-xml (libxml2) library (http://xmlsoft.org) and will be available
in the next release. I've successully tested my implementation with
all test vectors from C14N Interop report page
and from "set2" test vectors from Exc-C14N Interop report page
I was not able to test "set1" from Exc-C14N interop page because
it uses XML DSig stuff not available for libxml2 yet. It think,
you can include libxml2 in the interop reports for both standards
("Y" in all rows except for "set1" for Exc-C14N).




Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle w3 org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]