Re: [xml] xmlDocPtr returned by xmlSAXParseMemory()

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:15:53PM +0200, Holger Rauch wrote:
> I came accross that piece, which, if I get it right, clearly states that
> the tree is constructed using the DOM parser (since the first argument
> to xmlSAXParseMemory is NULL).

  yes,

> Concerning my original question: It seems like this was a
> misunderstanding. So, I will try to put it in a different way: If the tree
> is built as in libglade/test/saxp.c or in testSAX.c, does the returned
> xmlDocPtr remain untouched all the time? (That's what I meant by referring
> to "proprietary" tree structures).

  I don't understand. testSAX.c does not build the tree, and I don't know
libglade/test/saxp.c . So if the tree is not build what's the problem.
Either you call the parser to build a tree, or you give it a SAX callback
block and it won't build a tree by itself.

Be *very* specific, please.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/