Re: [xml] two Patches regarding HTMLtree.c
- From: paul-libxml sponagl de
- To: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] two Patches regarding HTMLtree.c
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:44:07 +0200
Hi Daniel,
+ if (cur->type == HTML_PRESERVE_NODE) {
+ if (cur->content != NULL) {
+#ifndef XML_USE_BUFFER_CONTENT
+ xmlBufferWriteCHAR(buf, (const char *)cur->content);
+#else
+ xmlBufferWriteCHAR(buf, (const char *) xmlBufferContent(cur->content));
+#endif
+ }
+ return;
+ }
I assume it's to avoid doing escaping in scripts
Scripts won't be processed 'preserved' without the patch, so
e.g. Javascripts will be processed as text to escape. the thing i did
was a diff between nodeDump and nodeDumpOutput. (There are a view
more inconsistencies between those functions, but i had not the time
to track further on)
/*
* Get specific HTmL info for taht node.
@@ -565,17 +575,6 @@
xmlBufferWriteCHAR(buf, cur->name);
xmlBufferWriteChar(buf, ">");
}
-#if 0
- if (!htmlIsAutoClosed(doc, cur)) {
- xmlBufferWriteChar(buf, "</");
- xmlBufferWriteCHAR(buf, cur->name);
- xmlBufferWriteChar(buf, ">");
- }
Hum, I decided on purpose to retain this code around, any reason why
to want to remove it ?
dumping to memory delivered _two_ closing tags
-#else
- xmlBufferWriteChar(buf, "</");
- xmlBufferWriteCHAR(buf, cur->name);
- xmlBufferWriteChar(buf, ">");
-#endif
Can you explain the reason why closing tag should be removed ?
if (cur->next != NULL) {
if ((cur->next->type != HTML_TEXT_NODE) &&
(cur->next->type != HTML_ENTITY_REF_NODE))
@@ -927,17 +926,9 @@
(cur->children != cur->last))
xmlOutputBufferWriteString(buf, "\n");
}
-#if 0
- if (!htmlIsAutoClosed(doc, cur)) {
- xmlOutputBufferWriteString(buf, "</");
- xmlOutputBufferWriteString(buf, (const char *)cur->name);
- xmlOutputBufferWriteString(buf, ">");
- }
-#else
xmlOutputBufferWriteString(buf, "</");
xmlOutputBufferWriteString(buf, (const char *)cur->name);
xmlOutputBufferWriteString(buf, ">");
-#endif
Again this removes uncompiled code left around on purpose, but this
won't fix anything.
if (cur->next != NULL) {
if ((cur->next->type != HTML_TEXT_NODE) &&
(cur->next->type != HTML_ENTITY_REF_NODE))
Please send some explanations, I will then look at integrating your
patch.
I had the problem that the #if 0 was ignored by gcc at this time.
(Please don't ask why - i'm still wondering - the preparsing-output
showed that it's still in the code) - so i decided to remove all the
stuff - Maybe the bad weather that day ;)
bye
Paul
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]