Re: intltool build failure

[Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com>]

on 10/25/01 12:34 PM, Jonathan Blandford at jrb redhat com wrote:

> libxml[12] doesn't depend on glib at all -- you just need a sufficiently
> new libxml1 so you don't have include conflicts.

I build libxml1 out of HEAD, so it's new enough. The only pain is that I
build most everything from cvs using eazel-hacking, and I eazel-hacking
doesn't have a handy way to build both libxml1 and libxml2 from different
branches of the same cvs module, and I'd prefer not to spend time adding
that feature to eazel-hacking right now.

I think it would be easiest for me if there was some way to build intltool
without libxml2 for now (not the default, of course, and never package it
that way).

    -- Darin