Re: [EWMH] _NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE_AUXILIARY
- From: Russell Shaw <rjshaw netspace net au>
- Cc: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [EWMH] _NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE_AUXILIARY
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:51:46 +1000
Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
On 2007-10-18, Lubos Lunak <l lunak suse cz> wrote:
This "arbitrarily messed with", just to make it clear, just means that they
will be composited on the screen,
...
Then there's of course the general UTF-8 monoculturism, but at least in
this case Xlib does the conversions from the abstract application internal
encoding (locale or wchar_t), unlike in many other FDO and other recent
FOSS crap, where the API and everything is UTF-8 monoculturist.
I gave up on most of the fragmented poorly designed non-console FOSS crap years
ago for GUI development and just wrote my own far better frameworks and
solutions.
What alternative is there to UTF-8? An advantage of monoculturalism is that
if the architecture is sufficient, everything can be consistant and easy.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]