Re: struts, workareas and xinerama

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Dana Jansens wrote:
> This has the property of being backwards compatible with previous
> versions of the specification.  An application can read only the first
> n (number of desktops) dimensions and ignore the remainder, and it
> will not end up putting icons in nowhereland.

It's probably not backward compatible; I know I've often written code 
that verifies the exact property length on various properties.

But if the proposal is otherwise popular we can just use a different 
property name.

Havoc