Re: Do-not-disturb protocol
- From: Lubos Lunak <l lunak suse cz>
- To: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Do-not-disturb protocol
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:59:47 +0100
On Thursday 19 January 2006 12:51, Bill Haneman wrote:
> Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
> >On 2006-01-19, Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman Sun COM> wrote:
> >>I don't understand what this has to do with the DO_NOT_DISTURB
> >>suggestion, though....
> >
> >That windows opened from an inactive window should not disturb the
> >work in a window with recent activity.
>
> But the original post was much broader in scope, at least the way it was
> written.
>
> Windows opened from an inactive window sometimes really must "disturb"
> or at least post above the most-recently-active window. This is
> important for alerts, and for certain accessibility use cases.
Yes. That's why I think it shouldn't be actually handled by the WM.
--
Lubos Lunak
KDE developer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SuSE CR, s.r.o. e-mail: l lunak suse cz , l lunak kde org
Drahobejlova 27 tel: +420 2 9654 2373
190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 2 9654 2374
Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]