Re: Do-not-disturb protocol

On Thursday 19 January 2006 12:51, Bill Haneman wrote:
> Tuomo Valkonen wrote:
> >On 2006-01-19, Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman Sun COM> wrote:
> >>I don't understand what this has to do with the DO_NOT_DISTURB
> >>suggestion, though....
> >
> >That windows opened from an inactive window should not disturb the
> >work in a window with recent activity.
> But the original post was much broader in scope, at least the way it was
> written.
> Windows opened from an inactive window sometimes really must "disturb"
> or at least post above the most-recently-active window.  This is
> important for alerts, and for certain accessibility use cases.

 Yes. That's why I think it shouldn't be actually handled by the WM.

Lubos Lunak
KDE developer
SuSE CR, s.r.o.  e-mail: l lunak suse cz , l lunak kde org
Drahobejlova 27  tel: +420 2 9654 2373
190 00 Praha 9   fax: +420 2 9654 2374
Czech Republic

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]