Re: _NET_WM_[GET_|TAKE_|REQUEST_]FOCUS & urgency
- From: Rob Adams <readams readams net>
- To: Elijah Newren <newren gmail com>
- Cc: wm-spec-list gnome org, Luke Schierer <lschiere users sourceforge net>
- Subject: Re: _NET_WM_[GET_|TAKE_|REQUEST_]FOCUS & urgency
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 16:59:32 -0700
Sorry I've fallen prey to a keyboard shortcut bug in ubuntu. See
correction below.
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 16:57 -0700, Rob Adams wrote:
> > Well, you may be right, I don't know. The smarter guys like Lubos and
> > Rob will have to comment here about the intention of
> > DEMANDS_ATTENTION.
>
> Well I don't want to claim I'm smarter than Elijah (especially since, as
> the one who wrote most of the code, his expertise in this matter now
> exceeds my own), but the basic reason for DEMANDS_ATTENTION was that the
> semantics were actually somewhat different than Urgent, plus its allowed
> to be set by the WM, and perhaps more importantly
*unset* by the window manager
> , which is required for this use of it.
>
> The lack of Urgent support in GNOME is really more of an oversight and
> we really should get around to supporting it. Honestly it should
> probably just be a if (DEMANDS_ATTENTION or Urgent) then do something
> attention-grabbing but not focus-grabbing.
>
> The relevent bug is here:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120439
>
> I think at this point we can probably move the part of the discussion
> involving the GNOME implemention to the comments on that bug, since
> we're way offtopic now.
>
> -Rob
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]