Re: _NET_WORKAREA and dual head
- From: Billy Biggs <vektor dumbterm net>
- To: Lubos Lunak <l lunak suse cz>
- Cc: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: _NET_WORKAREA and dual head
- Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 09:43:16 -0600
Lubos Lunak (l lunak suse cz):
> Dne pá 12. b?ezna 2004 18:31 Rob Adams napsal(a):
> > [...] But as I've said, the property does not yet exist -- it would
> > require modifying the specification.
This is all quite sad for me. :) OK, so on to finding the 'correct'
solution.
> Perhaps we should drop the _STRUT_PARTIAL hint (as it hasn't been part
> of any official spec release anyway), and go with _NET_WM_RESERVE_AREA
> or similar? And _NET_WORKAREA would have to be extended (or
> deprecated in favour of another hint) to provide a list of workareas
> per every screen (or maybe it could be deprecated in favour of making
> desktop icons apps find out the available areas from the hints
> themselves, but that's probably too much).
Since you mentioned desktop icon apps I have to bite. The application
I was thinking of was in an application trying to open a dialog that is
close to my main window but is never behind a panel (tricky too with
autohiding panels to know the right answer!). Still, it's the same as
the desktop icon case, I think, unless someone has another idea.
Given that there are uses of this besides just knowing rectangular
regions acceptable for icons, I think the best thing is to have a list
of reserved areas not necessarily on screen boundaries and publish some
(simple) client code to determine a work area per head from that. This
gives the most flexibility, I think the geometry calculations are simple
enough that it isn't a terrible burden on applications.
-Billy
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]