Re: RFC: pending EWMH additions

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

"Matthias Clasen" <Matthias Clasen poet de> writes: 
> Do you (or others on this list) have an opinion on the
> versioning problem which I raised earlier, or do you think
> its not an issue ?

I think it's something of an issue but I can't really come up with a
reasonable solution...

> I also would like to hear your opinion on the race condition
> between the wm and other clients grabbing the pointer/keyboard 
> when one client sends a _NET_WM_MOVERESIZE message after dropping
> its grabs. How should a wm behave if it receives MOVERESIZE message
> and finds the pointer/keyboard already grabbed ? The pragmatic
> solution would probably be to ignore the message in this case.

That's what metacity seems to do, it just gives up.

Havoc