Re: small patch, for UTILITY/SPLASH types, and FULLSCREEN state
- From: Bj|rn Englund <d4bjorn dtek chalmers se>
- To: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: small patch, for UTILITY/SPLASH types, and FULLSCREEN state
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 18:49:04 +0200 (MEST)
On 12 Oct 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > >
> > > No it should not always be on top.
> >
> > Why ? that seems very arbitrary and limited
> >
>
> Did you read Bjorn's sentence wrong? I did the first time too. ;-) I
> think he was agreeing that it shouldn't be a constraint, just an
> initial state.
To clarify: I was agreeing to that.
/Björn
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]