Re: small patch, for UTILITY/SPLASH types, and FULLSCREEN state

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

"julian adams" <julian adams gmx net> writes:
> > 
> > > I thought about that a bit - I think it implies that the window should
> > > be mapped on top, but I'm not sure it implies a constraint that the
> > > window is always on top - shouldn't you be able to Alt+Tab out of the
> > > fullscreen window? Can't you do this with PowerPoint presentations for
> > > example? And if there are two fullscreen windows can't you use Alt+Tab
> > > to go between them?
> > 
> > No it should not always be on top.
> 
> Why ? that seems very arbitrary and limited
> 

Did you read Bjorn's sentence wrong? I did the first time too. ;-) I
think he was agreeing that it shouldn't be a constraint, just an
initial state.

Havoc