Re: NET WM Spec implementation and changes
- From: "Michael Rogers" <mrogers cs ucl ac uk>
- To: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: NET WM Spec implementation and changes
- Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 00:50:37 +0100 (BST)
> Instead of using "StayOnTop" it may be better to use term "Important", or
> something like that, as it does not imply any specific reaction, but tells
> WM that client would like to be as higher on stack as possible, but
> whithin the WM mandated limits.
Exactly - and there's already an "Urgent" hint for this purpose.
Michael
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]