Re: Various comments, mostly on Implementation Notes
- From: Sasha_Vasko osca state mo us
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>,Matthias Ettrich <ettrich trolltech com>
- Cc: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Various comments, mostly on Implementation Notes
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 09:41:56 -0500
>I fixed both kwin and Qt (2.2) to do ICCCM compliant positioning. Let's
see
>who will complain :)
cool, dark ages may now be finally over :)
<snip>
>> The way that GTK+ does this now is to crawl up window hierarchy to one
>> window before the (pseudo-)root window and assume that that window
>> corresponds to the window manager decorations. Which may be
>> somewhat less than robust.)
>This is why we added that frame-geometry thing in the NET_WM hints.
hmm, I can't seems to find it. Is it in the latest specs ?
>The crawling up isn't too bad (I did that once in Qt), but it's pretty
>expensive (round-trip wise). I will add this again in Qt-3.0 on demand,
whenever
>somebody really needs the frame geometry (without breaking binary
>compatibility, I could only do it on ReparentNotify in Qt-2.x ).
The only problem I find with it is that you have to correctly distinguish
virtual roots, and don't crawl up higher, but with _NET_VIRTUAL_ROOTS that
should not be too big a deal.
Matthias
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]