Re: comments on current spec
- From: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- To: John Harper <john dcs warwick ac uk>
- Cc: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: comments on current spec
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:35:06 +0200 (CEST)
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, John Harper wrote:
> |> _NET_CLIENT_LIST[_STACKING]
> |>
> |> should this only include currently mapped windows?
> |
> |definitiely not. as in the old spec, the window manager has to provide
> |pagers/tasklists with all windows it actually manages, independant of
> |their skip-from-task-list/hidden/unmapped states, otherwise they simply
> |can't keep track of windows temporarily switching states (i.e. the
> |tasklist would loose track of iconified windows).
>
> I think I should have been clearer: I meant windows that the wm is
> aware of, but have been withdrawn by the client. They're not visible
> and they're not iconified, so there doesn't seem to be any point in
> putting them in the CLIENT_LIST properties?
ok, got it. yeah, withdrawn windows should be in the client list,
iconified ones should of course.
>
> John
>
---
ciaoTJ
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]