Re: Draft 1.9c
- From: Marko Macek <Marko Macek gmx net>
- To: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Draft 1.9c
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 19:21:52 +0100
> > -> > well thsi can be done just by PID :) oh hold on.. hmm no actually if
> > -> > the spawnign spawns a process that spawns yet another process that
> > -> > spanws yet another process (ie scriptS) then we have isses.. yes an
> > -> > inherited evnironment variable set by the wm fo rthat "launch" that is
> > -> > then set on all widnows displayed by that app.. yes.. i see this use..
> > -> > perhaps it shoudl be in the spec (apps have to set a property ont he
> > -> > window thta is the contents of thsi variable (numeric) ie:
> > -> > _NET_INSTANCE_ID(CARDINAL)
> > ->
> > -> I support this (and PID), but _INSTANCE_ID should be a string.
> >
> > hmmm - comments? i dont really have a prefernce... :)
>
> Sorry if I'm being somewhat slow here, but I don't quite follow what is
> being suggested. Applications should set an instance ID property, right?
> How do they get that instance ID?
Environment variable.
> I do know that being able to tie particular windows to a particular
> process allows one very neat feature: Give new windows focus, unless the
> user has deliberately focused another window since starting the app. It's
> a NextStep thing...
Yes, that could work and would be very nice. (But can be partially done
with group and transient hints already).
Mark
--
... There is no perfect file selection dialog...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marko.Macek@gmx.net http://www.kiss.uni-lj.si/~k4fr0235/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]